Skip to content
NUMOROX

Compound Interest Calculator

What a balance becomes when it grows on itself, with contributions added along the way — and how much of the final figure is growth rather than money you paid in.

Last reviewed

The address carries whatever you changed, so anyone opening it sees these numbers. Nothing is saved on our side.

Balance after 25 years

$462,290

You pay in $160,000 and the growth adds $302,290 on top — 65% of the final balance.

Total paid in
$160,000
Starting balance and contributions
Growth
$302,290
In today's money
$249,355
After 2.5% inflation
Growth as a share
65%
Of the final balance

Your numbers

Results update as you type. Nothing is saved or sent anywhere.

Zero is fine — most people start from nothing

Enter it net of fees

How often the return is credited

Only used to restate the balance in today's money

Where the balance comes from

Each column is the balance at the end of that year, split into the money you paid in and the growth sitting on top of it.

ContributionsGrowth
$462K$231K$0
1 5 10 15 20 25

Year

From year 17 onward the account holds more growth than money paid into it.

What another decade is worth

The same contributions, left alone for longer. Compounding is not linear in time, which is why the gap between the rows widens rather than staying even.

Final balance and growth at different horizons
HorizonBalancevs yours
5 years$40,000 paid in$49,973−$292,317 less in total
10 years$70,000 paid in$106,639−$265,651 less in total
20 years$130,000 paid in$300,851−$131,439 less in total
25 yearsyours$160,000 paid in$462,290—
30 years$190,000 paid in$691,150+$198,860 more in total
40 years$250,000 paid in$1,475,521+$923,231 more in total

How this calculator works

One formula for the balance, and one convention that decides whether the answer is right.

A = P (1 + r/n)n·t

with P the starting balance, r the annual rate, n the number of times a year it compounds, and t the years.

Contributions arrive monthly, so the projection advances a month at a time using a per-month factor of (1 + r/n)n/12. With nothing added this reproduces the formula above exactly, so the result agrees with a bank’s own arithmetic; with contributions it spreads each period’s growth across the months inside it, which is the only sensible way to credit growth on money that arrived part-way through.

What is assumed

  • The return is the same every year. No real investment does this, and the average is not the experience.
  • Contributions land at the end of each month, and every month.
  • No tax and no fees. Subtract fees from the rate you enter.
  • Nothing is withdrawn along the way.

A worked example

$10,000 to start, $500 a month, 7% a year compounded monthly, left for 25 years.

Where a $10,000 start and $500 a month ends up after 25 years at 7%
Starting balancePaid in on day one
Contributions$500 × 300 months
Total paid inStarting balance plus contributions
GrowthEverything above what was paid in
Balance after 25 years

Growth ends up nearly twice what was paid in, but it does not arrive evenly. For the first sixteen years the contributions are the larger half of the balance; only in year 17 does the growth overtake them, and from there the gap widens quickly. That crossover is the whole argument for starting early, and it is marked on the chart above.

Questions people ask

That depends entirely on what the money is in, and nobody can tell you what the next thirty years will do. A savings account pays whatever it currently pays. A diversified stock portfolio has historically averaged more than that over long periods, with years that were far worse and far better. Whatever figure you choose, enter it after fees — a 7% return in a fund charging 1% is 6% to you.

Growing what you save

NextInvestment ReturnWhat a portfolio returned, annualized

A projection at a constant rate, not a forecast. Real returns vary year to year, and the order they arrive in matters for anyone drawing the money down.